Thursday, 11 July 2013

What’s Lost in Winning?



# 71

   Last weekend was all Hip! Hip! and Hooray! across the land. We had Andy Murray winning the gentlemen’s singles at Wimbledon, The Lions taking the Rugby Union series in Australia and Chris Froome wearing the Yellow Jersey of the Tour de France.  For many hours it was true to say that British (and Irish) cups ‘ranneth over’. On Sunday afternoon the hot and sunny streets of South London had fallen unusually quiet save for spasms of gasps and yells and cheering spilling from the open windows of living rooms. Indoors, with curtains drawn to keep out the sun’s unfamiliar glare, the population were held in thrall to television pictures and commentary from the Centre Court at Wimbledon.

Pump me up before you go go.

   Everywhere fists were pumped, teeth bared and flags waved. For three or four hours the nation experienced something close to collective catharsis brought on by two extraordinary athletes playing lawn tennis. The infectious noise and frantic arm-waving provided evidence, which I still find quietly embarrassing, of how much less emotionally restrained we have become than our parents were. The spread of professional sport has made us all more competitive, more intense and more determined to win. We know we cannot play like that ourselves - most of us have never won anything - but we are desperate to identify with the winner or the winning side.

They argue with umpires…

   We are no longer recognisable as the people parodied by Michael Flanders and Donald Swann in their 1967 Song of Patriotic Prejudice. That was a time when (so they claimed) ‘the English, the English, the English’ were best and the English immodestly claimed that their sporting behaviour stood out in contrast to conduct in the rest of the world:

And all the world over each nation’s the same,
They’ve simply no notion of playing the game.
They argue with umpires, they cheer when they’ve won,
They practice beforehand, which ruins the fun…



…they cheer when they’ve won.

   When Andy won, he gratefully thanked his whole support team who had stood by him year after year; his trainers, coaches, fetchers, carriers and backers. Doubtless – somewhere amongst them – there was a ‘Sports Psychologist’; tasked with giving him the “…mental and emotional skills that athletes need for successful competition”[i] A mentor who could be relied upon to dismiss what used to be called ‘Corinthian values’; the ‘old-fashioned’ approach to sport that put amateurism, fair-play and morality above such sordid, vulgar, things as actually ‘winning’.


1934, 1935 & 1936, Fred Perry wins – cue polite applause. No arms raised, no flags waved.

   Today, thoroughly professionalised and all about money, sporting competition is no longer separated by its own special values and virtues from the grinding everyday world of market forces. The will to win at all costs has stripped much of the poetry out of sport. When it ceases to contain metaphors for the dilemmas we might encounter in life, sport is left with little to value but winning itself.

   The Corinthian Football Club, founded in 1892, is now largely forgotten although, in its heyday, its influence spread across Europe and reached even as far as Brazil. Real Madrid, for instance, originally chose to play in white shirts in respectful emulation of the kit worn by Corinthian FC. The Corinthians played only friendly matches and wouldn’t join the Football League or enter the FA Cup (until 1923) because they had rules forbidding them to compete for prizes of any description or take part in any contest that did not have charity as its primary objective. If the team they were playing lost a man, either through injury or by being sent off, the Corinthians immediately sent off one of their own men – just to keep the game even. Imagine Fergie or José The Special One offering to do that!

   The Corinthians of ancient Greece were proverbial for their wealth and profligacy but by Shakespeare’s time the title ‘Corinthian’ suggested a reliable ‘lad of mettle’. In Henry IV, Part 1, Act II, Scene iv, Prince Henry says of ‘Tom, Dick and Francis’ that;

“They take it already upon their salvation, that though I be but Prince of Wales, yet I am the king of courtesy; and tell me flatly I am no proud Jack, like Falstaff, but a Corinthian, a lad of mettle, a good boy…”

   Come the Regency period of the early 19th Century and ‘Corinthians’ described a group of hard-living aristocrats, dedicated to pleasure, pugilism and horse-racing. By the 1890s the term had lost its associations with gambling and licentious behaviour retaining only ‘gentlemanliness’, ‘amateurism’ and the notion of playing sport for love of the game - not profit. This was the world of Sir Henry Newbolt (1862-1938) who famously championed the virtues of chivalry and sportsmanship combined in the service of the British Empire. He belonged to a very particular class and period of history, displaying attitudes mostly alien to us now. Appropriately, he called his autobiography ‘The World as in My Time’ (1932). In so far as Newbolt is remembered now it is for his 1897 poem ‘Vitae Lampada’ (Torch of Life) which eventually became something of a millstone around his neck. By 1923 he was describing it to an audience in Canada as a “Frankenstein’s Monster that I created thirty years ago.” You will know the work (I’m certain). It begins;

There’s a breathless hush in The Close tonight,
Ten to make and the match to win –
A bumping pitch and a blinding light,
An hour to play and the last man in…

It’s clearly not simply a poem about cricket, belonging instead alongside Wellington’s observation that the battle of Waterloo had been won ‘on the playing fields of Eton.’

   Next year sees the centenary of the outbreak of the First World War and this, therefore, is the centenary of the last ‘endless’ summer of Edwardian England – mythologized by images of tennis and croquet played on green lawns, crisp rowing eights pulling together on bright rivers, cycling clubs touring dappled lanes and day-trips from the pier aboard friendly paddle-steamers. Reality, of course, was never like that. In England, the summer of 1913 was dry, dull and rather cool. But, when compared with the horror that was to come, there was an unnoticed finality – a hidden marker for the end of an era – to the undistinguished summer of 1913.

   ‘The Close’ that hosted Newbolt’s ‘breathless hush’ was the cricket field of Clifton College, Bristol. In June 1899, The Close was where A.E.J. Collins - then a thirteen year old schoolboy – made the highest cricket score ever recorded of 628, not out, in an innings that lasted across four afternoons. (Matches were not ‘time-limited’ in those days). Then, sure enough, with tragic inevitability, young Collins went on to get killed in action in November 1914 at the First Battle of Ypres. His body, like so many, was never found but his name is recorded in Wisden’s Cricketers’ Almanack and carved in stone on the Menin Gate.

   Newbolt’s poem linked his schoolboy cricketer to a battle in Africa, but a minor quibble about geography could not prevent the jingoism of 1914 applying its sentiments to the mud of Flanders or, later, to the slopes of the Gallipoli Peninsular;

The sand of the desert is sodden red –
Red with wreck of a square that broke; -
The Gatling’s jammed and the colonel dead,
And the regiment blind with dust and smoke.

The river of death has brimmed his banks,
And England’s far and Honour a name,
But the voice of a schoolboy rallies the ranks,
“Play up! Play up! And play the game.”



Give me strength.


   In ‘Take a Pew’, Alan Bennett’s wonderfully hollow sermon from ‘Beyond the Fringe’ (1960),[ii] he deliberately misquotes the words “of that grand old English poet, W. E. Henley;

When that One Great Scorer comes
To mark against your name,
It matters not who won or lost,
But how you played the game.

‘But how you played the game’. Words very meaningful and significant for us here, together, tonight. Words we might do very much worse than to consider…

   Now, as far as I can Google, the reference to One Great Scorer comes not from William Henley at all but from the poem ‘Alumnus Football’[iii] by an American sports writer named Grantland Rice (1880-1954). The theme of the poem is the need to ‘keep coming back’; this being the advice given by a ‘wise old coach called Experience’. The last verse begins;

Keep coming back and though the world may romp across your map,
Let every scrimmage find you still somewhere within the scrap;
For when the One Great Scorer comes
To mark against your name,
It matters not who won or lost,
But how you played the game.”


   Instead of this, the misquoted William Ernest Henley (1849-1903) had actually written ‘Invictus’; a much more considerable poem than ‘Alumnus Football’. From childhood, Henley was afflicted by tuberculosis of the bone and at the age of seventeen had one leg amputated below the knee. ‘Invictus’ was first published in 1875; the title being Latin for ‘unconquered’.  The first verse reads;

Out of the night that covers me
Black as the pit from pole to pole,
I thank whatever gods may be
For my unconquerable soul.

And the final verse;

It matters not how strait the gate,
How charged with punishments the scroll;
I am the master of my fate:
I am the captain of my soul.

   Although I have only quoted two verses, I recommend reading the whole. It is also, I believe, the origin of that phrase, familiar to politicians and sports commentators alike, “My head is bloody, but unbowed.” Henley implies that virtue is sufficient and avoids the sentimentality exhibited by Newbold and Grantland Rice. His inspiration derives from Stoicism and a belief that passion can – and should - be overcome by reason. This is an insight which explains, for me, why Sports Psychologists make a living but Sports Stoics don’t.


A player not being overcome by Reason.

The reputation of Henley’s ‘Invictus’ was greatly enhanced when we heard that it had been recited by Nelson Mandela as an inspiration to his fellow prisoners on Robben Island, but later dented when quoted too by the Oklahoma Bomber, Timothy McVeigh, on the eve of his execution. Poetry it seems, like sportsmanship, is eventually up for grabs.




[i] Random quote from the website of Winning Edge Psychological Services, St. Louis, Missouri. It seems there’s no competition that these guys can’t help you win!

[ii] See also my blog # 68, ‘Famished for shrapnel’ - below.

[iii] Published in The Pittsburgh Press, November 1914.